I failed to get the new video camera started for the race, but I did use it in qualifying.  Qualifying videos tend to be pretty boring, but I use the camera so that if I mess up, you’ll all get to see it!  This time, there was only one interesting moment, when I nearly lost it going through T8.

Playing with a new camera, new editing software, new posting mechanism, so this is really just an experiment!  If I continue to like this software, I’ll buy it.  It’s tied to the computer though and I’ll probably get a new one soon, so … for now you have to put up with that annoying text in the middle of the screen.

Camera is a cheap Aiptek HD, worked great, but has no provision for a wide-angle lens.  Wish you could see my hands in this one.  Bummer.

Due to an upcoming business trip, I planned to only do the first of the two races this weekend. Practice and qualifying were Friday, and the race was Saturday.

Things went pretty well in practice. Although I was over 1.5 seconds off of my personal best lap time at Thunderhill, the car felt great and I was fastest overall. The new video camera and lap timer worked great.

Qualifying wasn’t quite as good. I was slower than I was in practice, and ended up in P2 overall (P1 in ITR, being the only entry) behind Doug Makishima. Still, I actually kind of like being in 2nd place. Hunting down the car in front of me is a ton of fun. Trying to run away from the car behind me is a lot more stressful!

Read the rest of this entry »

The entry list was updated, up to 234 entries overall.  Still all alone in ITR, although with 7 ITS entries there could be some good speed at the front of the group 5 grid.  I am actually going to do only the first race of the weekend on Saturday and then head home, due to work pressures … flying off to the UK on Tuesday and there’s just too much to do between now and then.

The next SCCA race weekend is coming up on Memorial Day weekend. It’s a double at Thunderhill. 214 entries on the entry list, 10 days before the event.  Next update will be next week, hope we can get that closer to 250.

Unfortunately Mike U.’s ITR Prelude isn’t ready yet, in fact, he’s discovered that he doesn’t fit all that well in it … so I’m all alone in ITR again.  Hope he can fix that soon.  So even though Doug will say I have an advantage at Thunderhill due to the long straights, I’m hoping we have a pair of great battles.

In addition to driving an IT car, I’m also a member of the IT Advisory Committee, the committee that advises the CRB on all things related to the Improved Touring rules.

One of the things that the ITAC has been wrestling with over the past couple of years is how to account for engine torque.  We all know that big V8s (some of which were just classed into ITR last month) are torque monsters, and that other cars are “gutless,” like the high-revving 4-cylinders in the Honda S2000 and Acura Integra Type R, and fast-spinning rotaries like the Mazda RX-8.  Here is a quick look at some ITR cars and their published specs (including my own car):

When these cars were added to ITR, the ITAC added/subtracted some weight to some of them to try to make up for the torque effect.  But the fact is that the amount of weight added/subtracted was, as one ITAC member likes to put it, a POOMA (“pulled out of my ass.”)  And we hate that.  We want the weight-assignment process to be repeatable and consistent, and POOMA doesn’t really help with that.

Read the rest of this entry »